Usage guide

From the first challenge to the final review.

Questournament brings challenge creation, Moodle questions, answers, assessment and scheduling into one activity. The available actions depend on your role, capabilities and activity settings.

Learner view

Choose a challenge and check its window.

The activity hub offers list and card views of challenges, deadlines, difficulty, answer counts and points. Open a challenge to read its description and attachments. An approved challenge accepts answers only within its active window and response limit.

Questournament activity hub and list of challenges

Read

Check the prompt, questions, due date and any files before starting.

Respond

Use the answer form or Moodle question controls shown for that challenge.

Review

Return to the challenge or answer to see status, allowed feedback and next actions.

Moodle question bank

One challenge can contain several questions.

A composed challenge renders its ordered question collection using Moodle’s Question Engine. The author can select existing bank questions or create new ones, rearrange them and give each an independent maximum mark. Teachers may edit the composition later; student authors can use the bank only when that activity option is enabled.

A question is dragged to change its order while its preview remains visible inside the challenge
Visual composition

Reorder questions directly on their previews.

Unlike Moodle’s standard editor, you can drag each question directly on its preview and check the order while composing the challenge.

Question-bank selection in Questournament
Choose or create questions.
Moodle question rendered in a Questournament answer
Answer all questions in one attempt.

Automatic or mixed

When every question is automatically gradable, submission is graded immediately. With an essay or other manually graded question, the answer waits for human assessment; automatic marks still count in the final weighted grade.

Example. A correct automatic question worth 2 marks and an essay worth 3 marks assessed at 50% yield 70%: (2 + 0.5 × 3) ÷ 5.
Answer lifecycle

Assessment is not the same as correctness.

An automatically graded answer that misses the passing threshold is still assessed. A fully automatic answer can show Graded automatically; an essay or mixed challenge remains Not evaluated until a person applies the rubric. Teachers can see marks and feedback through all phases and can remove a manual override to restore the automatic grade when one exists.

Before the challenge closes, learners see whether their automatic answer is correct, their numeric grade and permitted teacher feedback, but not the correct answer. If an author or teacher allows another submission, Answer again starts a new attempt when the learner responds; the previous attempt stays in the history.

Automatic path

  1. Answer submitted.
  2. Question Engine grades the attempt.
  3. Result is assessed, whether it passes or not.

Manual or mixed path

  1. Answer submitted and marked pending.
  2. Author or teacher applies the challenge rubric.
  3. Automatic and manual marks are combined by their maximum marks.
Student author

Propose, then evaluate fairly.

With the right capability, a learner can propose a New plain challenge or, if enabled, a New challenge using the question bank. The teacher reviews and approves student challenges before they open. The author can assess peers’ answers with the agreed rubric; depending on activity settings, a teacher may need to validate those assessments.

Comments for the author and comments for students are shown to the appropriate audiences. A learner cannot see teacher-only controls merely by visiting the same page.

Teacher tools

Keep the tournament coherent.

Use the approval queue and attention badges to review proposed challenges and unevaluated work. Open a challenge to inspect its questions, answer list, author assessment, rubric and feedback. Edit dates inline in the challenge table or drag and resize bars in Schedule challenges, then select Save changes. The scheduler checks that existing submissions remain inside the challenge window.

Challenge scheduling Gantt and date table

Use the individual or team rankings to follow participation. Moodle backups include composed question slots, their order and marks, bank references and answer attempts when user data is included. Always test a restore before relying on a backup for course migration.

Read the badges

Two kinds of attention can coexist.

Approval pending means the teacher has not approved a proposed challenge. Not evaluated means its author assessment is still due. They are separate conditions and can appear together. The time-based phase then shows whether an approved challenge is waiting to start, in progress or closed.

Challenge

  • Approval pendingTeacher review needed.
  • Not evaluatedChallenge-author assessment needed.
  • Start pendingApproved; opening date has not arrived.
  • In progressAnswers may be accepted.
  • ClosedAnswer window or limit reached.

Answer

  • Not evaluatedHuman grading still needed.
  • Graded automaticallyAutomatic grade recorded.
  • PassedPassing threshold reached.
  • Allow to send againAnother attempt is permitted.
Points and feedback

Read the curve, not just the ranking.

The available reward can stay stationary, rise while a challenge remains unsolved, and fall after the first correct answer. The answer grade and the potential reward are different: quality determines what share of the available points is earned. Rankings can be individual or team-based according to the activity settings.

Stationary, inflationary and deflationary scoring phases
Make it yours

Start with one good challenge.

Expand to student authorship and composed questions when the group is ready.

Create an activity →